During July 2013, I completed
four days volunteering at ‘Oceans of Fun’ private day nursery. This experience
allowed me to interact with, and observe, children from six months to five
years old. I chose to work with children because I am fascinated by their
behaviour and development. The main aim of this voluntary work was to enhance
my study of Psychology; I will go on to detail some interesting observations
that I made (with a hint of basic analysis).
Babies (6 months – 2 years)
Having never really had much
interaction with babies, I found this to be a very novel experience. Babies are
messier than I thought; I guess they don’t have the cognitive ability to care
if there’s snot all over their face.
Children of this age seem to
develop very quickly – I was told that one boy had gone from not being able to
walk or talk to being able to do both within three months. Some of the older
children were able to identify their own body parts and understood the concept
of colours while the younger ones had not even said their first word. However, knowledge
of colours was not yet very advanced and one boy was telling me everything I
pointed to was ‘yellow’.
Ideas of gender were not
developed at this age. Little boys would happily play with female bracelets
without considering that they were items typically ‘for girls’. According to
Kohlberg’s Gender Development Theory, these children would be just beginning to
form ideas of gender. Some of the older would enter the Gender Identity Stage,
in which they can label themselves as male or female.
The
babies’ relationships with each other were limited. They seemed aware of others
but did not possess the cognitive ability to de-centre and appreciate the world
from another’s point of view. They would not consider the feelings of others
and they were not very good at sharing toys. They would be just as happy
playing alone as when other children were present. However, there were examples
of when one of the older boys would show affection towards one of the younger
ones by hugging and kissing him.
Children of this age seemed to
form attachments quickly. Within less than half an hour of my arrival, one boy
was sat on my knee, squashing my face with his hand. He was very entertained by
our game involving a ball and ramp, in which he would delightedly clap his
hands and say ‘ball’. However, these attachments that the children formed with
me did not seem permanent or sustained. After lunch break, many appeared to had
forgotten me and certainly when returning a week later they did not recognise
me.
I enjoyed working with children
of such a young age. I discovered that they like to climb, be mischievous,
touch shiny things (including my braces!), and that they fall over a lot!
Toddlers (2 years – 3 years)
There was
obvious advancement in the toddlers when compared with the babies. They addressed
each other by name, their communication and interaction had developed, they had
learnt colours and they had deeper
understandings of consequences and of the world around them.
One toddler
appeared to have an issue with attachment. Every morning when his mother left
him, he would throw a terrible tantrum, which involved screaming and kicking in
a very violent manor. This same child had issues when being put down to nap, he
cried a lot and refused to sleep.
The children
understood the concept of being ‘cross’ at each other, showing that their
relationships and friendships had developed with age. However, they were still
entertained by simple things, for example, while playing outside, a truck pulled
up and their excitement was uncontrollable - they ran to the fence to stare and
wave at it. Unlike the pre-schoolers they did not need imaginary games to keep
them occupied; they were perfectly content digging in a sandpit or moving water
around in buckets.
Pre-school & Early Years (3 years – 5 years)
These children were able to speak
and communicate relatively coherently. They had formed stronger relationships
with each other – they would play games together, talk and respond. They would
also respond more readily to the adults and showed greater understanding of
commands, such as ‘tidy up’. They knew ABCs and other basic songs. They
understood colours and enjoyed matching the colours of their plastic cups to
the colours of their clothing.
As far as their language
development was concerned, they had not developed ideas of pragmatics. They
would talk without considering whether others had relevant context. For
example, they would say “my mummy…” as if the receiver knew their mother
personally, and “you know in the lion king when…” without stopping to ask
whether the receiver had watched the film. This showed they made assumptions
that, because they understood the context, others did too.
Children of these ages were able
to understand the concept of pain. For example, a girl told me that she didn’t
want her ears pierced because it would hurt. Previously, the children were
unable to understand painful consequences; they would not consider that by
climbing on a table they may fall and hurt themselves, or, by throwing an
object they may hurt someone else. However, even pre-school children did not
consider the pain of falling over when running in excitement. Their excitement
and impatience outweighed their fears of pain, which maybe explains why
children of this age are so often falling and grazing their knees (I speak from
experience of many trips to the school staff room with blood running down my
leg on to my frilly white socks!).
Children of this age had
developed ideas of gender. Girls said that nail polish and lipstick were not
for boys, showing they were gathering ideas and stereotypes, allowing them to
make sense of the world around them. However, girls still enjoyed books about
cars and boys showed some interest in brushing hair (however, they preferred
games in which they pretended to shoot each other). According to Gender Schema
Theory, these children would be starting to develop their gender schemas and
using them to determine what activities and objects were appropriate for them
and others of their sex. Some of the older children had more developed ideas of
gender which seemed to have a bigger impact on them. For example, one girl was
sat alone outside, not playing with others because she was upset about wearing
a ‘boys’ coat’. Despite this, children will still engage in play with others of
the opposite genders. Children were not yet segregating into same sex groups
and forming rivalries with the opposite sex, as can be observed in schools.
As expected, imaginary games were
common. Girls would enjoy playing with dolls and performing ‘family’ style
re-enactments. This can be explained by Social Learning Theory: the children
will have observed and imitated role models in their environments. Also, children seemed to be showing imitation
of role models e.g. their parents, in other ways. For example, they would
repeat things that had been said to them and pretend to answer phones. The
children liked it when I would draw pictures for them and they attempted to
copy them.
At this age, children were not
very good at concentrating and their attention could not be held on one thing
for sustained periods. They had lots of energy and were very excitable. They
were fascinated by the nursery’s butterfly chrysalises and were very excited
when we took them to the pet shop to buy some goldfish, which, comically, they named
Rosie, Freddie and John!
These children, like the younger
ones, formed quick relationships, for example, after less than one hour a girl had
decided I was her best friend. These relationships lasted longer than with the babies;
the girl remembered our friendship throughout the day. Children would call many
others their ‘best friends’. This shows that having closeness to another is important
to them and that they form quick attachments. It also shows some form of
competitiveness, in that the children feel the need to label others with ‘best
friend’, thus not allowing other children to have the same, exclusive,
relationship with that child.
While watching girls playing on a
rope swing, I observed that the more fun an activity or object is, the less
likely the children will share it and consider others’ feelings. On another
occasion, I noticed that one girl was being bossy and controlling over her male
friend and was telling him what to do. However, he complied to this and didn’t
seem to mind. A group of children made up stories about us all being part of a
happy family e.g. I was the mummy, they were the brothers and sisters. This
shows that children desire a happy and nurturing home environment and they seek
it in others they feel comfortable with.
The children understood ideas of
different ages i.e. the pre-schoolers understood ‘early years’ children were
older. This shows they are able to think beyond themselves and their immediate
situation. They also understood ideas of growing up, moving on to school and
not returning to nursery. However, a lot of these ideas seemed like they had
been rehearsed and repeated from what their parents had told them.
I very much enjoyed working with
these children. I discovered what it was like to be used as a climbing frame
and to be the subject of hair dressing from four year olds. Also, I got the
chance to play in a ball pit for the first time in 10 years! This was a very
rewarding, interesting and enlightening experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment